I won’t reinvente the wheel by telling the story behind Health 2.0 Accelerator. I have pasted the original article for more details. However, I want to talk about how I can be benefical to be involved in this project. For example the first project in which members will take part is about moving pharmaceutical data. The advantage of such an initiative is inspired from the opensource contribution widely common in software communities. People in healthcare  could then focus on solving more complex problems that plague the actual healthcare sector. Stay tuned, the wiki is up and running at Health2Accelerator.org

“For several months there has been discussion amongst Health 2.0 companies about the concept of a Health 2.0 Accelerator. It started with Marty Tenenbaum’s introduction of the concept in September 2007. It continued with the discussion at the San Diego meeting in March 2008. Since then conversations and meetings among a small group have continued to define a first cut at what the Health 2.0 Accelerator should be.

The basic idea is for organizations to collaborate to create “public goods” —frameworks and strategies that will help all concerned to advance the industry. The way to do this is via projects that tackle particular problems, and leave behind frameworks and utilities that all can use.

The reality is of course going to be more complex, but we’re delighted to announce that the first project concerning moving pharmaceutical data has been announced, and the first principles and statements about the future of the Accelerator are now up at its own wiki at Health2Accelerator.org.

We are now asking for everyone in the Health 2.0 Community to become members, suggest projects, and contribute to the wiki. This is very much a work in progress, but we believe that the potential is huge. Please go to the new site, and contribute by giving us your comments.”

By Mathieu Hault and Indu Subaiya

I was reading Scott Shreeve’s crossoverhealth blog the other night, and I stumbled upon maybe the most insightful article on IT and healthcare I read in the last couple weeks. He is stating that governments are spending more and more money in Telemedicine projects that use their proprietary network and hardware software. These guys have missed the train, and are doing an anachronism. Sadly, this article just clearly states the IT medical space is still taken from another perspective than other fields and is still in its infancy while it should clearly be mainstream nowadays. In fact, all technologies needed to support it are available.

But we need to not forget that people are driving the revolution themselves, by using web 2.0 tools to communicate, find information about health and wellness, and even practice auto diagnosis. People are then ready to use more advanced tools to perform other tasks, like auto managing their health, their medications intakes, and health in general. They also want to use these tools to talk to their doctors. 

Some startups have seized the opportunity, and are developing tools, using technology that has existed from some time now, to enhance patient experience with health care, making the end user happier and healthier.

Your TeleDoctor is in Vencorps and has applied for funding. This opportunity will allow me to get direct feedback from peers in a controlled environment. I have been invited by Will Pate, that believes in the potential of TeleDoctoring, to take part in the alpha. If you an entrepreneur, investor, technologist, web enthousiast and want to get an invite, please drop me an email.

Your TeleDoctor is looking for a service provider to build an alpha version of the service.

Here are the options I found so far:

• Elc Techlnologies that have a Service for Entrepreneurs to provide you with a 1.0 version in as little as 6 weeks. The cost is 90K, all inclusive. Their portfolio is impressive.
• Atlantic Dominion Solution offers to develop around 25 mockups and provide me with one month with one developer for around 32K. Of course, this doesn’t ensure that I will have all the funtionalities implemented. I don’t know how much I should add to this, knowing tht a developer’s rate is $11o an hour.
• InfoEther is a superstars rails shop and have people like Chad Fowler and Rick Kilmer as developers. Their rate is $200 to $225 dollars an hour. This is pretty expensive but can offer consultancy if I choose to work with less skilled developers.
• HashRocket has a program similar to Elc Technologies called 3-2-1 Launch, but the duration is 1 month. They provide you with two developers, rough out an application in 3 days and spend the rest of the month cleaning up and adding features the application according to customer feedback.
• Freelancers. I don’t know what to say about freelancers but from my previous experience, it is very hard to manage someone that will get paid on a hourly basis. I think the best option for someone with limited ressources is to fix the goal. The compagnies that I stated have a proved process and can deliver. One of the problems I ran into for my previous startup is running out of money while paying developers $90 an hour. I spent over $15,000 dollars for maybe one or two functionalities that are not even working properly.

So if you are a rails shop and wants to work towards building an alpha version of teledoctor, please send me an email to mehdi.akiki@gmail.com.

I have been thinking all day long about ways to enhance the experience for the people that will be using a teleconsultation service over the Internet. One simplistic idea will be to allow patients to consult a doctor without caring about his/her location. This is what I call the global healthcare marketplace. As for any disruptive idea, there will be many hurdles that should be surpassed:

• Developing countries physicians are not as competent: A number of doctors in developing countries have degrees outside their country and attend international conferences to keep up to date.
• Laws protecting doctors like in Quebec, Canada and North America in General: Like for any other service, the globalization and internationalization of medicine is something that cannot be fought against for a long time from now on. Medicine is becoming more and more transparent. The people that want to keep it opaque are doing it to protect their interests and those of a community of doctors. This has nothing to do with the consumer. The consumer/patient should be empowered and should be the central piece of the puzzle. We need to give the consumer its lost place. (Rate my doctor).
• Cultural Difference: Most doctors in the United States and in Canada are immigrants. There are some minor specificities to the medicine and sicknesses but a doctor has the same formation and the human body is the same wherever you go. Many studies have reaveled common traits in humans no matter their ethnicity or skin color.
• Remote consultations are not as reliable as face to face: There has been many studies in the subject. In Ontario for instance, it was shown that patients resent no major difference compared to face to face visits with their psychiatrists. Also, it has been shown that more than 80% of the visits to a general practitionner end up without having a physical contact with the patient.This idea to develop the service into a world wide advice network of physician has grown up and could present an alternative to the shortage for doctors in Canada and the States.